Blind
pupils. -- As long as a man knows very well the strength and
weaknesses of his teaching, his art, his religion, its power is still slight.
The pupil and apostle who, blinded by the authority of the master and by the
piety he feels toward him, pays no attention to the weaknesses of a teaching, a
religion, and soon usually has for that reason more power than the master. The
influence of a man has never yet grown great without his blind pupils. To help
a perception to achieve victory often means merely to unite it with stupidity
so intimately that the weight of the latter also enforces the victory of the
former.
from Nietzsche's Human, all too Human, s.122,
R.J. Hollingdale transl.
Friedrich Nietzche juxtaposes two
main characters within this quote, the priest (any authoritative religious
figure) and the religious follower. He describes the priest as being able to
identify the fact that his teachings are not without flaws and imperfections.
However, the priest will use this knowledge to influence those that are not as
advanced as him. The pupil will listen to the ideals of the priest in order to
better understand this idea of religion. The problem with this process is that
priests do not allow room for interpretation about their religious teachings.
Therefore, to be a “good” religious follower you must do so without using
common sense, personal judgment or science. The priest becomes more like a
dictator while his followers are his militia. Whether or not the intent of the
priest is good, is irrelevant, because the influence the priest has amongst his
followers is very high. As the priest obtains more followers, his power
consequently also becomes greater.
The importance of the role of the
pupil must be further elaborated. Here, Nietzche describes the pupil as having
“more power than the master”. Having just one follower is better than having no
followers for the priest. This makes the pupil extremely valuable for the
priest. A pupil that listens to the priest without questioning his ideals and
does so in good faith has become invaluable; this is because the priest can
more easily manipulate the pupil with his religious views. A pupil that is not
ignorant to the flaws of the religious teachings of the priest can appreciate
his teachings but make his own interpretations of how to appreciate “God”.
I feel that this theory of the
priest and pupil has been used throughout history and still are being practiced
today. When Adolf Hitler was in power, he was able to convince the German
people that by following his ideologies they will no longer suffer the aftermath
of WWI. He also used his power of influence on people to commit horrible crimes
against Jewish people during the holocaust. Today, use of this power occurs
with Taliban in Afghanistan. Through the misuse of the Muslim religion they
have succeeded in manipulating the Afghani people. Afghanistan has
progressively digressed into the state it is today. A place where women were
able to attend school freely has no such luxuries now. The Taliban have
targeted Afghani people who are poor and are uneducated to initially start up
their following. As their following grew, so has their tyranny within the
country. In America, the teachings of the priest are used to target those who
are seeking gay marriage. There is no reason why two people should not be allowed
to be married to each other because they are of the same sex. However, those
who are not homosexual follow the beliefs of their priest rather than judging
themselves and having social acceptance for those who are different.
I think the power is in the pupils because their unquestioning belief becomes a force- in your example, Hitler had the ideas but it took several Nazis to perpetuate the crimes. In the quote, Nietzche seems to be saying that the master knows more and questions more but is less powerful than the pupils that know less and do not question. I think he is saying that what we believe in gives that more power than it might have.
ReplyDeleteThis is really interesting how you connect this first to Hitler, then to the Taliban! There is a new book just published by Yale, Nazis, Islamists and the Making of the Modern Middle East by Barry Rubin and Wolfgang Schwanitz, that explores actual concrete links between these groups. Do you think it is a good thing then, that the U.S. is in Afghanistan right now, or do you think they make things worse?
ReplyDeleteI actually feel that Afghanistan needs the US troops in order for their central government to become more stable. Unfortunately, the Taliban are still very powerful in Afghanistan and oppress and manipulate the people of Afghanistan in order to gain control and have more power in the country.
ReplyDelete